| 1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users) |
|
Why NOT make DD Secret-keeper?, Was it stubborness, or... |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 04:25 PM
|

Getting Fitted for New Dress Robes

Posts: 43
Joined: 9:45pm April 27, 2007
Location: Grading papers in the Great Hall

|
McGonagall tells Rosmerta (PoA, pg. 205, US version): "James Potter told Dumbledore that Black would rather die than tell where they were, that Black was planning on going into hiding himself... and yet, Dumbledore was worried. I remember him offereing to be the Potters' Secret-Keeper himself."
Siruis persuades James to switch the Secret-Keeper to Pettigrew, instead of the most powerful wizard of the age. WHY?
Option #1: Stubborness - they stubbornly wished only to keep the Secret-Keeper position within the Maruaders, and wished to show Dumbledore by not letting him know the real Secret-Keeper (DD testified that Sirius WAS the SK). The Maurders were stubborn, yet why not tell DUMBLEDORE that you switched Secret-Keepers?
Option #2: James, Lily, and/or Mauraders had some kind of mistrust of Dumbledore or disagreement. If so, what is this? Did they think he was paranoid? Were they afraid DD would tell someone?
--------------------
Dumbledore is still my boss! 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 04:35 PM
|

Eeylops Owl Cage Cleaner

 
Posts: 239
Joined: 4:38pm May 17, 2007








|
hhhmmmm the way i remember it, was they wanted dd, but he suggested sirius, then sirius got the potters to pick peter...am i right?
--------------------
 dobby:socks is my favorite clothes!
|
|
|
Similar Topics
Similar Topics
|

Sorting is now open for our Prisoner of Azkaban reading groups! Click here to sort!

Shopping at The Cauldron Shop supports this forum!

|