Leaky Lounge

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The Rules : FAQ : Search : Member List : Sitemap

Forum News: All you ever wanted to know about Jo's Book Nook
Hot Thread: PoA Animal Poll in the HP Book Club.
Mod Thread: David Tennant - Actor of the Month Discussion

The Biggest Unanswered Questions...part 3, All questions...big and small...start here

Iheartprofessors... Iheartprofessorsnape View Member Profile	Sep 17 2009, 11:10 AM Post #1
Property of the Half-Blood Prince Posts: 6,304 Joined: 10:10pm February 23, 2007 Location: Paying my last respects to Severus Snape	well...it seems we've filled another questions thread. The old one can be found here. Happy Posting!! Iheartprofessorsnape Leaky Lounge Moderator -------------------- Albus Severus...you were named for two headmasters of Hogwarts. One of them was a Slytherin and he was probably the bravest man I ever knew." Harry Potter

Replies

i<3weaslys View Member Profile	Oct 13 2009, 07:04 PM Post #2
Being Eaten by the Pea Soup Posts: 19 Joined: 6:16am September 23, 2009 Location: Sharing a lemon drop with the Headmaster of Hogwarts	I have couple more questions; Can Hagrid Apparate/Disapparate? Also, does anyone know if Avada Kedavra works on plants? Also,it was mentioned in GOF,but why does a Confundus Charm work on a magical object? This post has been edited by i<3weaslys: Oct 13 2009, 07:05 PM -------------------- We did it, We bashed them, wee Potter's the one, and Voldy's gone moldy, so now let's have fun.-Peeves

midzy View Member Profile	Oct 13 2009, 07:20 PM Post #3
Hiding in the Iron Maiden at Borgin and Burkes Posts: 329 Joined: 1:47am August 20, 2009 Location: The Burrow with Fred and George	QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 14 2009, 08:04 AM) I have couple more questions; Can Hagrid Apparate/Disapparate? if hagrid couldn't apparate/disapparate, how did he get to the place where harry was with the dursleys at the beginning of PS? he was supposed to pick him up i don't remember anything about his motorbike there good question i<3weaslys This post has been edited by midzy: Oct 13 2009, 07:21 PM --------------------

rubikscubemaster View Member Profile	Oct 13 2009, 07:30 PM Post #4
Perusing the Magical Menagerie Posts: 95 Joined: 1:50pm October 10, 2009	QUOTE(midzy @ Oct 13 2009, 08:20 PM) QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 14 2009, 08:04 AM) I have couple more questions; Can Hagrid Apparate/Disapparate? if hagrid couldn't apparate/disapparate, how did he get to the place where harry was with the dursleys at the beginning of PS? he was supposed to pick him up i don't remember anything about his motorbike there good question i<3weaslys I remember Hagrid taking a boat on the way off that little island but I may be wrong. I haven't read the first book in quite some time which is why I just started it tonight. -------------------- Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak! Thank you.

midzy View Member Profile	Oct 13 2009, 07:58 PM Post #5
Hiding in the Iron Maiden at Borgin and Burkes Posts: 329 Joined: 1:47am August 20, 2009 Location: The Burrow with Fred and George	QUOTE(rubikscubemaster @ Oct 14 2009, 08:30 AM) QUOTE(midzy @ Oct 13 2009, 08:20 PM) QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 14 2009, 08:04 AM) I have couple more questions; Can Hagrid Apparate/Disapparate? if hagrid couldn't apparate/disapparate, how did he get to the place where harry was with the dursleys at the beginning of PS? he was supposed to pick him up i don't remember anything about his motorbike there good question i<3weaslys I remember Hagrid taking a boat on the way off that little island but I may be wrong. I haven't read the first book in quite some time which is why I just started it tonight. oh ok i haven't read PS for quite some time so i don't remember these little details anymore. that makes sense, it just came to me that if he had apparated then harry would have been with him on their way to Diagon Alley and that's what i don't remember being mentioned in the book. thanks RCM --------------------

harrydavid View Member Profile	Oct 13 2009, 09:50 PM Post #6
Diagon Alley Watchwizard Posts: 2,290 Joined: 5:11pm May 4, 2007 Location: Texas	QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 13 2009, 10:38 PM) The Ministry can only detect that magic was performed around an under aged Wizard, not who performed it. So there was no danger of Moody being implicated. If you assume that the Ministry haven't added any extra detection spells. We are told that the Ministry can't tell who does the magic. Dumbledore explains this to Harry in OotP. QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 13 2009, 10:38 PM) So there was no danger of Moody being implicated. Everyone in the Order would be implicated, because the Ministry aren't stupid and they will know that The Order moved Harry and presume (probably very accurately) that the whole Order would be involved in the planning of this illegality and therefore were accessories before the fact. They also know of someone who was definitely complicit - Harry - so could cause all sorts of problems if Harry was required to go to the Ministry to give evidence about his part in this offence. Thus even if the Ministry don't prove that Moody did the apparation they can cause the Order all sorts of problems while they investigate and Voldemort and the death eaters could easily exploit this and use it to get to Harry. Why would the act of one person implicate the whole Order? For all they would know it could have been anyone? Beside that, this is certainly not the only thing the Order could be implicated in. They could equally be implicated in all sorts of other "crimes" according to the Ministry. Why would this be any different from all the other things they were doing to resist Voldemort and the Ministry? QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 13 2009, 10:38 PM) So there was no danger of Moody being implicated. Also, canon states that the Ministry made Apparition in and out of Privet Drive illegal, not impossible. Canon doesn't say anything about whether apparation in and out of Privet Drive is impossible or not, probably because the Order wouldn't know what measures the Ministry have taken to enforce the regulations they had passed. You are free to assume that if you wish, but I'll go by the text which says that it was illegal, not impossible. QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 14 2009, 08:04 AM) Can Hagrid Apparate/Disapparate? After their trip to Diagon Alley, Hagrid puts Harry on the train to go back home. He is standing on the platform with Harry looking right at him. And Harry blinks and Hagrid is gone. So, the obvious implication is that Hagrid can Apparate. This post has been edited by harrydavid: Oct 13 2009, 10:06 PM -------------------- "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -Albus Dumbledore

roonwit View Member Profile	Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM Post #7
Leaky Lounge Over Achiever Posts: 9,335 Joined: 4:57am January 28, 2005 Location: near Muggleswick, UK	QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) If you assume that the Ministry haven't added any extra detection spells. We are told that the Ministry can't tell who does the magic. Dumbledore explains this to Harry in OotP. That is in the context of the Trace, which is a very wide ranging detection. They might be able to to put in place more specific detection for a particular location (for example the wizarding equivalent of a concealed camera would work). QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) Why would the act of one person implicate the whole Order? For all they would know it could have been anyone? It is obvious (the death eaters certainly think so). They may not have any actual proof but they probably have enough (given their rather lax approach to justice) to start arresting Order members on suspicion. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) You are free to assume that if you wish, but I'll go by the text which says that it was illegal, not impossible. It can be both illegal and impossible so Canon says nothing about whether or not it is impossible, and it is just your assumption that the two options are exclusive and that the Order would know about all the measures the Ministry would take to enforce their laws. So as with many things, it all comes down to how you interpret the text, and what factors you take into account. QUOTE(rubikscubemaster @ Oct 18 2009, 02:04 PM) At nights when Harry was hungry, why couldn't he slip on his invisibility cloak and go into the kitchen? It wouldn't help that much, because Harry is more in danger of being heard than seen, and if the Dursleys are up and about there is a big risk of one of the Dursleys bumping into Harry, and him having his cloak confiscated. This post has been edited by roonwit: Oct 19 2009, 03:42 PM -------------------- W.L.Y.J. We love you Jo

harrydavid View Member Profile	Oct 19 2009, 10:29 PM Post #8
Diagon Alley Watchwizard Posts: 2,290 Joined: 5:11pm May 4, 2007 Location: Texas	QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) If you assume that the Ministry haven't added any extra detection spells. We are told that the Ministry can't tell who does the magic. Dumbledore explains this to Harry in OotP. That is in the context of the Trace, which is a very wide ranging detection. They might be able to to put in place more specific detection for a particular location (for example the wizarding equivalent of a concealed camera would work). Yes, they might have been able to. But since there is no evidence that they were able to or that they did, then I'll assume they didn't. QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) Why would the act of one person implicate the whole Order? For all they would know it could have been anyone? It is obvious (the death eaters certainly think so). They may not have any actual proof but they probably have enough (given their rather lax approach to justice) to start arresting Order members on suspicion. By this theory they would have arrested them all anyway. So, it doesn't matter what they do. QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) You are free to assume that if you wish, but I'll go by the text which says that it was illegal, not impossible. It can be both illegal and impossible so Canon says nothing about whether or not it is impossible, and it is just your assumption that the two options are exclusive and that the Order would know about all the measures the Ministry would take to enforce their laws. So as with many things, it all comes down to how you interpret the text, and what factors you take into account. Yes, what factors you take into account matter. And I don't take into account things like "they might have cast a spell to prevent Apparition" when there is no evidence that they did or even considered it. -------------------- "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -Albus Dumbledore

roonwit View Member Profile	Oct 22 2009, 03:10 PM Post #9
Leaky Lounge Over Achiever Posts: 9,335 Joined: 4:57am January 28, 2005 Location: near Muggleswick, UK	QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 20 2009, 04:29 AM) QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) Why would the act of one person implicate the whole Order? For all they would know it could have been anyone? It is obvious (the death eaters certainly think so). They may not have any actual proof but they probably have enough (given their rather lax approach to justice) to start arresting Order members on suspicion. By this theory they would have arrested them all anyway. So, it doesn't matter what they do. I don't think so. The Ministry need to have some excuse to start arresting people, which still seems to be the case even after Voldemort takes over, because they need to be seen to be acting reasonably by the public and people within the Ministry, or those in power will be replaced. The Ministry would get that excuse if it the Order performed an illegal act for which it was obvious to everyone that they were involved. -------------------- W.L.Y.J. We love you Jo

harrydavid View Member Profile	Oct 22 2009, 09:27 PM Post #10
Diagon Alley Watchwizard Posts: 2,290 Joined: 5:11pm May 4, 2007 Location: Texas	QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 22 2009, 03:10 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 20 2009, 04:29 AM) QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM) Why would the act of one person implicate the whole Order? For all they would know it could have been anyone? It is obvious (the death eaters certainly think so). They may not have any actual proof but they probably have enough (given their rather lax approach to justice) to start arresting Order members on suspicion. By this theory they would have arrested them all anyway. So, it doesn't matter what they do. I don't think so. The Ministry need to have some excuse to start arresting people, which still seems to be the case even after Voldemort takes over, because they need to be seen to be acting reasonably by the public and people within the Ministry, or those in power will be replaced. The Ministry would get that excuse if it the Order performed an illegal act for which it was obvious to everyone that they were involved. Last time I checked, obvious to everyone that they were involved doesn't mean they can prove it. The Order was responsible for all sorts of things that it would have been obvious to everyone that they were involved, but that didn't cause them to be arrested. This would have been no different. -------------------- "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -Albus Dumbledore

roonwit View Member Profile	Oct 25 2009, 03:04 PM Post #11
Leaky Lounge Over Achiever Posts: 9,335 Joined: 4:57am January 28, 2005 Location: near Muggleswick, UK	QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 23 2009, 02:27 AM) Last time I checked, obvious to everyone that they were involved doesn't mean they can prove it. True, but it does mean they, and those involved (including Harry) can be brought in for questioning. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 23 2009, 02:27 AM) The Order was responsible for all sorts of things that it would have been obvious to everyone that they were involved, but that didn't cause them to be arrested. But, whereas some of them would be questionable, few, if any, would actually be illegal. And I rather doubt that the Ministry did know that much about what the Order was up to anyway (which is why for example they had to try to follow Dumbledore). QUOTE(Muggle1 @ Oct 23 2009, 05:55 PM) The main questions I've always had are how come Harry still had a bed in Gryffindor Tower when he hadn't been at School all year? Yes, Harry is assuming a lot, not least that the room is still there and hasn't suddenly acquired a lot of extra ventilation and pieces of plaster. But I don't think the beds would have been removed. Harry, Ron and the others could theoretically still turn up or come out of hiding even if many of them would be arrested or disciplined if they did. QUOTE(Muggle1 @ Oct 23 2009, 05:55 PM) Also, how come he can ask Kreacher to bring him a sandwich there, when there's never been any mention of house elves taking the students food in their dormitories before? I think it is simply something Harry and his dormitory mates hadn't tried or didn't have the opportunity to try. I don't think students could call the Hogwarts house elves for a sandwich, so it would have to be a student with their own house elf based at Hogwarts which would be fairly rare. But there is no reason why it shouldn't work for Harry, as he has summoned Kreacher within Hogwarts before, and Kreacher would happily deliver a sandwich. This post has been edited by roonwit: Oct 25 2009, 03:36 PM -------------------- W.L.Y.J. We love you Jo

harrydavid View Member Profile	Oct 26 2009, 02:48 PM Post #12
Diagon Alley Watchwizard Posts: 2,290 Joined: 5:11pm May 4, 2007 Location: Texas	QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 25 2009, 03:04 PM) QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 23 2009, 02:27 AM) Last time I checked, obvious to everyone that they were involved doesn't mean they can prove it. True, but it does mean they, and those involved (including Harry) can be brought in for questioning. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 23 2009, 02:27 AM) The Order was responsible for all sorts of things that it would have been obvious to everyone that they were involved, but that didn't cause them to be arrested. But, whereas some of them would be questionable, few, if any, would actually be illegal. And I rather doubt that the Ministry did know that much about what the Order was up to anyway (which is why for example they had to try to follow Dumbledore). You acknowledge that they don't know much about what the Order is up to, but you assume that they will know specifically that they helped Harry escape. First off, they wouldn't know who to question. Secondly, they wouldn't know what to ask them. Finally, they wouldn't know if they answered honestly or not. For all they know Harry Disapparated on his own and they wouldn't know where he was to question him. They know he can, after all. It is fantasy to assume that Moody would end up in Azkaban if he helped Harry leave Privet Drive using side-along. -------------------- "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -Albus Dumbledore

roonwit View Member Profile	Oct 26 2009, 04:05 PM Post #13
Leaky Lounge Over Achiever Posts: 9,335 Joined: 4:57am January 28, 2005 Location: near Muggleswick, UK	QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM) You acknowledge that they don't know much about what the Order is up to, but you assume that they will know specifically that they helped Harry escape. Yes, I do. In general I don't think the Ministry knows much about what the Order does, but it would be completely obvious to everyone that if Harry leaves Privet Drive with magical help, and Voldemort doesn't start parading his dead body then the Order got him out. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM) First off, they wouldn't know who to question. They would have a very good idea. They probably know for example at least some of the houses that are now being protected, and there would be some obvious suspects, such as Arthur Kingsley and Tonks, plus others who were close to Dumbledore such as Moody. And of course the obvious person to question would be Harry. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM) Secondly, they wouldn't know what to ask them. I would have thought it was completely obvious what questions the Ministry would ask such as were you at Privet Drive, what do you know about the illegal apparation there and who else was involved? QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM) Finally, they wouldn't know if they answered honestly or not. There are such things as legilimency and veritaserum, and other methods to detect dishonesty. Some Order members could probably survive such examination but I doubt all of them could. QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM) For all they know Harry Disapparated on his own and they wouldn't know where he was to question him. But they do know where Harry is, or at least the Minister does. -------------------- W.L.Y.J. We love you Jo

Posts in this topic

Iheartprofessorsnape The Biggest Unanswered Questions...part 3 Sep 17 2009, 11:10 AM

GaryPotter When Harry was trying to confirm where Sirius was ... Sep 17 2009, 11:44 AM

Burger The floo network was bugged, they had trackers on ... Sep 18 2009, 06:27 AM

harrydavid I have seen no direct evidence in the books for th... Sep 18 2009, 09:23 AM

GaryPotter QUOTE(harrydavid @ Sep 18 2009, 10:23 AM)... Sep 18 2009, 12:21 PM

The-T-Dane Cool debate about the Floo Network here. It makes ... Sep 18 2009, 02:24 PM

freakinwinky I too had the impression that flooing in and out o... Sep 20 2009, 09:09 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(freakinwinky @ Sep 20 2009, 10:09 P... Sep 20 2009, 10:03 PM

CriminallyVu1gar I always wondered why Merope named her son after h... Sep 21 2009, 11:35 AM

showbiz27 What happened when Harry Potter was "killed... Sep 22 2009, 11:09 AM

roonwit QUOTE(showbiz27 @ Sep 22 2009, 05:09 PM) ... Sep 22 2009, 04:01 PM

Lisbry Hi. :) I have a question .. In book five: ... Sep 26 2009, 06:30 AM

roonwit QUOTE(Lisbry @ Sep 26 2009, 12:30 PM) But... Sep 26 2009, 07:32 AM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(roonwit @ Sep 26 2009, 08:32 AM) QU... Sep 26 2009, 12:13 PM

Lisbry QUOTE(roonwit @ Sep 26 2009, 07:32 AM) QU... Sep 26 2009, 06:18 PM

roonwit QUOTE(Lisbry @ Sep 27 2009, 12:18 AM) And... Sep 26 2009, 06:34 PM

ingalls QUOTE(roonwit @ Sep 27 2009, 01:34 AM) Th... Sep 27 2009, 04:36 PM

roonwit QUOTE(ingalls @ Sep 27 2009, 10:36 PM) If... Sep 27 2009, 05:57 PM

ingalls QUOTE(roonwit @ Sep 28 2009, 12:57 AM) QU... Sep 27 2009, 06:06 PM

roonwit QUOTE(ingalls @ Sep 28 2009, 12:06 AM) I ... Sep 28 2009, 03:27 PM

ProudGreen89 I have a question, when DD visits young Tom Riddle... Sep 29 2009, 10:54 PM

midzy QUOTE(ProudGreen89 @ Sep 30 2009, 11:54 A... Sep 29 2009, 11:48 PM

cooncatbob QUOTE(ProudGreen89 @ Sep 29 2009, 08:54 P... Sep 30 2009, 12:27 AM

ProudGreen89 QUOTE(cooncatbob @ Sep 29 2009, 10:27 PM)... Sep 30 2009, 12:59 AM

roonwit QUOTE(ProudGreen89 @ Sep 30 2009, 04:54 A... Sep 30 2009, 04:46 AM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(roonwit @ Sep 30 2009, 05:46 AM) QU... Sep 30 2009, 12:57 PM

Burger There are really 3 choices for a magical child: 1)... Sep 30 2009, 05:12 AM

harrydavid QUOTE(Burger @ Sep 30 2009, 05:12 AM) The... Sep 30 2009, 01:55 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(harrydavid @ Sep 30 2009, 02:55 PM)... Sep 30 2009, 03:53 PM

paint it Black Here's my puzzle. Dumbledore tells Harry that ... Oct 1 2009, 02:38 AM

harrydavid QUOTE(paint it Black @ Oct 1 2009, 02:38 ... Oct 1 2009, 07:17 AM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 1 2009, 01:17 PM) ... Oct 1 2009, 04:09 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 1 2009, 04:09 PM) QUO... Oct 1 2009, 05:23 PM

Wendall QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 1 2009, 10:23 PM) ... Oct 2 2009, 08:09 PM

paint it Black QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 1 2009, 08:17 AM) ... Oct 2 2009, 11:29 AM

harrydavid I agree with paint it Black. Jo obviously changed ... Oct 2 2009, 09:41 PM

i<3weaslys I have a question that pertains to Deathly Hallows... Oct 9 2009, 05:25 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 9 2009, 06:25 P... Oct 9 2009, 09:14 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(Bookworm_Weasley @ Oct 9 2009, 09:1... Oct 10 2009, 12:04 AM

lirene QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 10 2009, 01:04 AM)... Oct 10 2009, 12:08 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(lirene @ Oct 10 2009, 01:08 PM) QUO... Oct 10 2009, 11:26 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(Bookworm_Weasley @ Oct 10 2009, 11... Oct 11 2009, 01:25 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 10 2009, 06:04 AM)... Oct 13 2009, 02:34 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 02:34 PM) QU... Oct 13 2009, 04:38 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 13 2009, 10:38 PM)... Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM

i<3weaslys Sorry, I thought I had read in OOTP that the Minis... Oct 10 2009, 07:56 AM

i<3weaslys I have couple more questions; Can Hagrid Apparate/... Oct 13 2009, 07:04 PM

midzy QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 14 2009, 08:04 ... Oct 13 2009, 07:20 PM

rubikscubemaster QUOTE(midzy @ Oct 13 2009, 08:20 PM) QUOT... Oct 13 2009, 07:30 PM

midzy QUOTE(rubikscubemaster @ Oct 14 2009, 08... Oct 13 2009, 07:58 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 13 2009, 05:10 PM) QU... Oct 13 2009, 09:50 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM)... Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 19 2009, 03:37 PM) QU... Oct 19 2009, 10:29 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 20 2009, 04:29 AM)... Oct 22 2009, 03:10 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 22 2009, 03:10 PM) QU... Oct 22 2009, 09:27 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 23 2009, 02:27 AM)... Oct 25 2009, 03:04 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 25 2009, 03:04 PM) QU... Oct 26 2009, 02:48 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 07:48 PM)... Oct 26 2009, 04:05 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 26 2009, 04:05 PM) QU... Oct 26 2009, 08:58 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 26 2009, 08:58 PM)... Oct 27 2009, 02:19 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 27 2009, 01:58 AM)... Oct 28 2009, 04:02 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(roonwit @ Oct 28 2009, 04:02 PM) QU... Oct 28 2009, 10:46 PM

tattoodave QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 14 2009, 03:50 AM)... Oct 26 2009, 11:45 AM

Hannibal Granger QUOTE(tattoodave @ Oct 26 2009, 12:45 PM)... Oct 26 2009, 01:45 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(midzy @ Oct 13 2009, 08:58 PM) QUOT... Oct 14 2009, 01:15 PM

moony_lupin QUOTE(Bookworm_Weasley @ Oct 14 2009, 07... Oct 14 2009, 01:54 PM

i<3weaslys I think you're right,midzy. Still hagrid said ... Oct 13 2009, 07:30 PM

i<3weaslys You're right. I have another question; Can ve... Oct 13 2009, 07:34 PM

sairah Was Professor Quirrel killed at the end of Socerer... Oct 14 2009, 08:05 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(sairah @ Oct 14 2009, 08:05 PM) Was... Oct 15 2009, 08:29 AM

sairah QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 15 2009, 06:29 AM)... Oct 15 2009, 01:00 PM

i<3weaslys QUOTE(harrydavid @ Oct 15 2009, 09:29 AM)... Oct 15 2009, 04:40 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(i<3weaslys @ Oct 15 2009, 04:40 ... Oct 15 2009, 05:28 PM

mistressquill One thing I really would have loved to have known ... Oct 16 2009, 11:31 PM

sairah QUOTE(mistressquill @ Oct 16 2009, 09:31 ... Oct 17 2009, 01:39 AM

harrydavid QUOTE(sairah @ Oct 17 2009, 01:39 AM) QUO... Oct 17 2009, 08:02 AM

rubikscubemaster It was always said that Harry had summer homework.... Oct 18 2009, 08:04 AM

Kneazlekoneko QUOTE(rubikscubemaster @ Oct 18 2009, 01... Oct 18 2009, 05:10 PM

sairah QUOTE(rubikscubemaster @ Oct 18 2009, 06... Oct 18 2009, 09:27 PM

Muggle1 The exact wording in Deathly Hallows is that it... Oct 23 2009, 12:55 PM

Silvia_CMC QUOTE(Muggle1 @ Oct 24 2009, 01:55 AM) Th... Oct 23 2009, 11:31 PM

GaryPotter QUOTE(Bookworm_Weasley @ Oct 27 2009, 03... Oct 29 2009, 11:32 AM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(GaryPotter @ Oct 29 2009, 11:32 AM)... Oct 30 2009, 12:08 PM

UnshackledAuror In response to post #10.It appears to me that both... Oct 30 2009, 01:00 PM

Codem What I would like to know is why Harry didn't ... Nov 1 2009, 01:53 AM

midzy QUOTE(Codem @ Nov 1 2009, 02:53 PM) What ... Nov 1 2009, 02:45 AM

GaryPotter QUOTE(midzy @ Nov 1 2009, 02:45 AM) QUOTE... Nov 2 2009, 12:29 PM

harrydavid Harry has an exceptionally poor memory whenever th... Nov 1 2009, 06:30 PM

Bookworm_Weasley QUOTE(harrydavid @ Nov 1 2009, 06:30 PM) ... Nov 2 2009, 04:00 AM

harrydavid QUOTE(Bookworm_Weasley @ Nov 2 2009, 05:0... Nov 2 2009, 12:11 PM

RobynAlexa This is a really interesting thread and I wanted t... Nov 4 2009, 02:30 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(RobynAlexa @ Nov 4 2009, 03:30 PM) ... Nov 4 2009, 05:17 PM

jerrycasto It's always struck me as odd that Hogwarts in ... Nov 4 2009, 09:21 PM

harrydavid QUOTE(jerrycasto @ Nov 4 2009, 10:21 PM) ... Nov 6 2009, 10:48 PM

roonwit QUOTE(harrydavid @ Nov 7 2009, 03:48 AM) ... Nov 8 2009, 12:21 PM

jerrycasto QUOTE(harrydavid @ Nov 6 2009, 10:48 PM) ... Nov 7 2009, 12:50 PM

jerrycasto 2 more questions where do dementors come from? I... Nov 9 2009, 04:13 PM

Norian QUOTEand this one is more of a "what-if... Nov 10 2009, 11:43 AM

harrydavid QUOTE(jerrycasto @ Nov 9 2009, 04:13 PM) ... Nov 10 2009, 02:26 PM

look_at_me_ i always wondered why they didn't just use a t... Nov 10 2009, 12:21 PM

3 Pages

1 2 3 >

« Next Oldest · Post-DH Predictions: Predicting the Unpredictable · Next Newest »

3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

Display Mode: Switch to: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic · Subscribe to this forum

Sorting is open now for Deathly Hallows! Follow this link.

Coming Up:
The Corner Booth is on Hiatus Join us in the New Year!

Come right in to the Shrieking Shack Arcade!

Shopping at the Cauldron Shop supports this forum!

IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error
There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here