The official webforum of the The-Leaky-Cauldron.org LeakyNews.com: Leaky Info | Potter News | Features | Interactive | Galleries | The Books | The Films | For Fun

Leaky Lounge

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )
The Rules : FAQ : Search : Member List : Sitemap

Forum News: New Book Nook now open, discussing J D Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye"
Hot Thread: Stand In Line! The Harry Potter Theme Park/Ride!
Mod Thread: Nominate an Actor/Actress of the Month to discuss

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Who is Boo Radley?
Dreamteam
post Aug 8 2008, 11:20 AM
Post #1
One Half of the DDD


Group Icon

Posts: 8,476
Joined: 5:31pm August 30, 2006
Location: Siriusly Dreaming Somewhere




















We hear a lot about Arthur "Boo" Radley from Jem and Scout in the opening chapters, although they've never seen him and never spoken to him. Where do they get their information? All the adults seem to refer to him as "Arthur", where do the children get the name "Boo"?

Who is Boo Radley? Where is the justification for keeping him confined to the house? Whose decision is it to keep him there, is it just his family or do you think its partly his own?

What impact does he have on the Finches throughout the book? Later Scout does get to meet him, although only once in her whole life. What do you think of his actions at the end of the story? Were you surprised that Scout never saw him again, or that he never tried to visit Jem once he regained consciousness? Do you think that Jem would have wanted to visit him, or would he instinctively understand Boo's reclusiveness?


--------------------

November's book is The Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger
"THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE DIED!" roared Black. "DIED RATHER THAN BETRAY YOUR FRIENDS,
AS WE WOULD HAVE DONE FOR YOU!"

Go to the top of the page
Profile CardPM
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
momwitch
post Aug 19 2008, 11:42 AM
Post #2
Doctor Filibuster's Junior Assistant


***

Posts: 1,963
Joined: 8:57am March 12, 2005
Location: at Home or somewhere in between




















When I was reading the description of Arthur's appearance at the end of the book, I was reminded of a movie I saw a number of years ago called Powder . I was astonished at the similarities between Boo Radley and Powder, and thought that perhaps Powder was its writer's attempt to explore the character of Boo in depth.

We learn from Miss Maudie that the Elder Mr Radley was a "foot-washing Baptist" (page 44 Grand Central Publishing paperback):

QUOTE
Miss Maudie settled her bridgework. "You know old Mr. Radley was a foot-washing Baptist--"
"That's what you are, ain't it?"
"My shell's not that hard, child. I'm just a Baptist."
"Don't you all believe in foot-washing?"
"We do. At home in the bathtub."
"But we can't have communion with you all--"
Apparantly deciding that it was easier to define primitive baptistry than closed communion, Miss Maudie said: "Footwashers believe anything that's pleasure is a sin. Did you know some of 'em came out of the woods one Saturday and passed by this place and told me me and my flowers were going to hell?"
"Your flowers, too?"
"Yes ma'am. They'd burn right with me. They thought I spent too much time in God's outdoors and not enough time inside the house reading the Bible."


It made me wonder that Arthur might have been conceived in a moment of pleasure, between his parents, and that they wished to hide away from their kin (much like Adam and Eve hiding away from God in the Garden of Eden when they feel guilt for the first time), and hide the proof of their pleasure: ie. Arthur, along with them. When Arthur runs a bit wild as a teenager and gets in trouble, it is enough to prove that he is sinful and must be confined and controlled by his parents. As long as Arthur is visible or around, he is evidence of his parents' sin, and for that reason alone, he is shut up within a prison, which is maintained by his brother - the righteous result of his parent's union, conceived in the bonds of wedlock. Arthur is the second son, but his conception could have been the result of the Radleys' discovery that marriage obligations can have benefits beyond the strictly procreational mandate of : "Be fruitful and multiply".

It appears to me, that Nathan and Arthur are representations of the sons of Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, in which Cain kills Abel after God finds Abel's sacrifice more pleasing. The plugging up of the gift tree with cement is justified to Scout by Nathan with the lie of because it was dying. This speaks volumes to me that Nathan wanted to act as God in prohibiting the eating of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge for if they did, "you shall surely die" (Genesis 2:17).


This post has been edited by momwitch: Aug 19 2008, 11:56 AM


--------------------
Avatar made with Poser 6 and Photoshop Elements
Go to the top of the page
Profile CardPMEmail Poster
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Sorting for Half-Blood Prince is open! Click here to join!
Coming Up:
Join the chat! Saturday 1-3pm Of Power, Magic, and Government
Come right in to the Shrieking Shack Arcade!
Shopping at the Cauldron Shop supports this forum!
IPS Driver Error

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.
You can try to refresh the page by clicking here