QUOTE

This has actually provided a pretty clear-cut example of why literary theorists are hostile to the idea that authorial intent is the “right” interpretation; to echo what a lot of people all over the internets are saying, “If he is, why didn’t you say so in the first place?” Which demonstrates a sort of native understanding that even the author’s interpretations of a work are just another interpretation and you can quarrel with them. If you feel that the books don’t support the contention that Dumbledore is gay, you have just as much right to say so as Rowling has to say that she feels there’s some unspoken gay love going on. In fact, if a character really is gay and meant to be read as so, sometimes you have to spell it out within the book, because heteronormativity dictates that most people are not going to see a character like Dumbledore as gay without a big flashing sign telling them to.