Harry Potter is Dead, The phenomena is over |
 Jan 11 2008, 11:21 AM
Post
#201
|
|
WhizzHard Books Copy Editor Posts: 2,152 Joined: 12:18pm July 22, 2005 Location: Reading KSK, Deadspin, TheBigLead, and the Fanhouse.    |
This is not meant to be a depressing thread, I just wanted to put it out there. (Yes, I know it's not an original thought).
Being now almost 6 months gone from the release of DH, I begin to wonder about the actual lasting power of the series. I know during all the high times and hullabaloo the popular consensus among most fans was that these books were here to stay. We all felt that these would become part of the lexicon of children's literature along with Dahl, Bloom, Potter (Beatrice); and many even felt they'd sit alongside Tolkien and Dickens as well. Now that we're past the point of revelation, I wonder, is it all over but the shoutin'? I, for one, think Harry Potter is dead. There is still enough money to be made that the hype machine will keep rolling on, at least past the point of the final DVD release. He's dead though. I think HP, as a work of literature, will fade to the point of being simply answers to trivia questions. The legacy of the fandom, particularly the ways in which the fansites were leveraged by the publishers and studios, will endure as a template for other works. That's Harry Potter's legacy, as a phenomena, not as a work of literature. |
 |
  
 
|
